polyclonal antibody against egr1 (sc110) Search Results


97
Santa Cruz Biotechnology polyclonal anti egr 1 antibody sc 110
Polyclonal Anti Egr 1 Antibody Sc 110, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pmc03500324-44-0-11?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal anti egr 1 antibody sc 110 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rabbit anti egr1 igg
Rabbit Anti Egr1 Igg, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pm16091742-171-13-17?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti egr1 igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology egr1
Egr1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pm29494759-94-54-56?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
egr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology α egr1
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
α Egr1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pmc04671020-156-31-32?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
α egr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Santa Cruz Biotechnology egr 1
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
Egr 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pmc03602689-347-7-4?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
egr 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology p53
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
P53, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pm20453878-173-12-28?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p53 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
NSJ Bioreagents p53 antibody / tp53
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
P53 Antibody / Tp53, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/custom%40v8130%4010%2E1074%2Fjbc%2Em008454200?v=NSJ+Bioreagents
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p53 antibody / tp53 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rabbit anti zif 268 egr 1
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
Rabbit Anti Zif 268 Egr 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pm28361770-125-27-35?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti zif 268 egr 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
NSJ Bioreagents alpha actin antibody / acta2
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
Alpha Actin Antibody / Acta2, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/custom%40v2001%4021726677?v=NSJ+Bioreagents
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alpha actin antibody / acta2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Active Motif antibody nfκ-b
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
Antibody Nfκ B, supplied by Active Motif, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/10__1161_slash_atvbaha__109__190678-128-18-16?v=Active+Motif
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody nfκ-b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology c ebpβ
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
C Ebpβ, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/10__1042_slash_bj20060044-46-2-13?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c ebpβ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibodies against pkcε
( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and <t>Egr1.</t> ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).
Antibodies Against Pkcε, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+antibody+against+egr1+%28sc110%29/pmc03652077-162-7-23?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against pkcε - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and Egr1. ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Fine-tuned SRF activity controls asymmetrical neuronal outgrowth: implications for cortical migration, neural tissue lamination and circuit assembly

doi: 10.1038/srep17470

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Left panel: distribution of SRE site prediction scores (>0.8) for SRF-upregulated genes and an equal number of SRF downregulated genes. Right panel: percentage of genes with an SRE matching score >0.8 within up- and downregulated genes. ( B ) Salient GO categories enriched in SRF-upregulated genes. Depicted are the enrichment over baseline and the transformed adjusted p-value. The vertical line indicates the 0.05 significance threshold. ( C ) Scheme of the experiments. Cultures infected at DIV4 and samples collected at DIV10. ( D ) ChIP assays confirm the direct binding of caSRF to the promoter of Arc and Egr1. ChIP-qPCR assays for specific promoters using primers close to the SRE-containing region. The number of SRE sites and the highest Transfac matrix similarity score for SRF binding (obtained with PSCAN) are indicated. α-VP16: specific antibody, IgG: preimmune. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005: ns: not significant; Student’s t test (n = 4–6). ( E ) RT-qPCR assays confirmed the upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of candidate genes retrieved in the transcriptomics analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 referred to GFP. Student’s t test (n = 3–4). ( F ) The co-infection of neuronal cultures with ciSRF and caSRF shows that ciSRF interferes with caSRF-dependent transcription. Data in bar graphs are expressed as means of the fold changes ± SEM and were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. The (*) symbols indicate statistical difference between all the conditions and caSRF; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005 (n = 3–4). ( G ) Immunohistochemistry against Egr1 in cortices of P20 mice electroporated with GFP alone (GFP) or in combination with caSRF (caSRF). Scale bar: 100 μm. ( H ) GFP- and caSRF-electroporated retina showing cells with upregulated Egr1 and Arc upon caSRF expression (red arrowheads).

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used in this study are α-GFP (Aves Labs, GFP-1020), α-MAP2 (Sigma, M9942), α-GFAP (Sigma-Aldrich, G9269), α-VP16 (mouse monoclonal from Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-7545; rabbit polyclonal from Sigma-Aldrich V4388), α-Egr1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-110), α-SRF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-335), α-dsRed (Clontech, 632496) and α-Arc (Synaptic Systems, 156-003).

Techniques: Transformation Assay, Infection, Binding Assay, ChIP-qPCR, Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing